This is probably too obvious to mention, but AI apps now make it easier than ever to provide annotated lists of erotic fiction. There are two caveats: AI engines tend to mention titles by well-known authors or publishers, especially if it has a Wikipedia page or a movie adaptation. Over time AI engines may be programmed to self-censor titles which it judges as non-notable or content which violates some arbitrary standard. It can’t find everything! Be sure to check out some human-created lists which AI might overlook (including two of my own).
Jan 2026 Update. I’ve spent a lot of time trying to devise prompts which cause Gemini AI or Rufus (on Amazon) to recommend erotic fiction. It’s been frustrating. Below the prompts I describe some of the limitations of asking AI to generate such lists.
AI Prompts for Discovering Erotica Titles and Authors
Shameful Attractions. Suggest a list of 25 well-known and critically acclaimed fiction titles which were originally in English or translated in English and where “shameful attractions” or “ambivalent desire” is a theme or part of the plot. These titles can be sexually explicit but they should not involve rape.
Sci Fi + Erotica. Can you provide a list and summary of 20 science fiction books which also contain themes related to sexuality? That would include novels about sex roles, gender identity, dystopian fantasy, sex with robots or imaginary creatures, rituals of courtship and mating, psychological analysis of sexuality of nonhuman creatures and alternate approaches to procreation and family.
2000-2013 Erotic + Praised by Critics. Can you list and give a brief description of literary works of 20 English-language works of fiction published between the years 2000 and 2013 that have been both praised by book critics and also described by readers and critics as very sensual or sexually explicit?
AI Limitations
I have been quickly discovering the limitations of using AI engines to generate lists of books that are sexually explicit or about sexuality.
First, most of the AI tools are built with tight controls over online sources of information which have sexually explicit content. For example, Gemini certainly is aware of all the content on the ripemangotaketwo.com, but it would almost never reference this information except in very rare cases because the website has as meta tag in the header which says content=”adult.” On the other hand, it mostly uses online sources which do not have adult content or come from a mainstream online source like Cosmopolitan or Literary Hub.
Second, Gemini reports that it favors “confirmed reviews” from customers who have been verified to purchase it on the Amazon website. It tends to rank lower in importance any reviews popping up on platforms like Goodreads. If it favors reviews on blogs, it is blogs which do not have sexually explicit content. So if you want your erotic novel about orgies in Lithuania to be included in an AI-generated list, pray that a review of it appears on a G-rated family-friendly blog.
Third, Rufus (Amazon’s attempt to do AI) not only has content filters, it can’t access page count or other inside-the-book details.
The more fundamental problem is that Gemini lumps in a lot of popular romance novels together with explicit novels. About 80% of the books which Gemini selects end up being conventional romance novels with typical tropes. Hey, I don’t need the books to be salacious and full of clinical language and amoral behavior. But the book list generated don’t even come close to being sexy. It looks for certain keywords which suggest sexual activity: “open door,” “erotic romance,”
Leave a Reply